Pages

Sunday, August 27, 2017

HFC S2016: The Industrial Revolution


Our title image is care of PlanPhilly and shows the Benjamin Franklin Bridge under construction - the deck of the bridge is the last element to go in and has not begun construction yet. Now a integral and iconic part of the Philadelphia skyline, it is almost impossible to imagine the city without the bridge - yet for people as recent as our grandparent's generation have recollections of crossing the Delaware only via ferry. Note the heavy industrial usage of the waterfront (no RiverSharks Stadium for another 50+ years!)
See this image and more at PlanPhilly (an excellent resource for current efforts of city development in Philadlephia)

The Industrial Revolution is the topic of these lectures. Again we will be referencing many cities, and not at all by chance an intense look at Philadelphia. Philly earned the nickname "Workshop of the World" and is a prime example of a city shaped by the industries of the era.
Many of the neighborhoods in the city were built on the outskirts of factories, many larger mansions in and out of the city were built for the industrialists, and many institutions were founded, and found homes during the building projects made possible by the age.

Additionally the forces of industry which left their mark on the city still echo through the city, still influence the placement and type of business long after the crest of the revolution. (for example with the wane of the ship building industry on Hog Island, the ever increasing needs for an airport with ample space push the development of the Philadelphia International Airport we know today).
Another well documented example that is currently being actively studied by the city is the Delaware Waterfront, once home to a massive shipping industry, dock, industrial train traffic - it is now developing into a recreational, and potentially much-needed-park space for residents and tourists (another prime example of this re-orientation and re-development is right across the shore at Camden's waterfront).
Your task: read through lectures 17 + 18  and engage with your classmates, per our standard terms.

Lecture 17 + 18 Required Questions:
Are there other examples of development in the city (like Hog Island) that you can see the effects of?

Pick an area of the city which used to be industrial landscapes and has since changed, altering themselves to other purposes - what do you think is in store for future development of these post-industrial sites?

If possible see if there are any photographs of the area in it's industrial heyday - Temple University Library's Urban Archives are an excellent resource to pull from!
http://library.temple.edu/scrc/urban-archives

Comments due by this coming Monday

HFC S2016: Immigration + The City

Immigration and the American City


Please post comments below for lectures 19, 21 and 24. We will extend this lecture assignment to an extra few days as it often contains some of the most interesting, timely, and diverse doscussions of the semester. These lectures focus on the effects immigration has had in shaping and reshaping our american cities. Use your weekend to talk with your friends and family as a means of extending the lecture beyond itself and engage with your own histories and experiences moving to, from and around cities (or staying in one place and being a part of its developing character).

Post your responses for Monday evening and then take take Tuesday to review and ask questions to your classmates. Wednesday will be devoted to answering previous questions and repeat continuing new discussion repeating through the week Thursday and Friday.

image from Metro Trends article:

Recently posted on the Philadelphia Inquirer's website Philly.com Life Behind the Lobby tells the extended story of the Indian-American immigrant experience through the focused lens a subset of immigrants that own and operate hotels - a more modern immigrant experience, one beyond the images of ships pulling into Ellis Island that often gets conjured up when talking about immigration and America.  Two different new's organizations have also reported on this book (check it out for your own edification)



Optional/post as separate additional post: How has the immigrant experience affected the city around you? Or a family member? Or a section of the city you have a relationship with?


Initial Comments are due Monday April 11th

Stay tuned over for an extra credit lecture and response posting (good to make up at least one missed lecture). If you have missed a previous lecture this is an excellent way to make good on it!

HFC S2016: Searching the City

By this point in the semester we have studies a broad array of cities in a varsity of epochs and the effects of military, planning, social, industrial, and cultural effects that have sculpted and shaped the neighborhoods, districts and ever evolving boundaries of those cities. This past week culminated in your own intensive search, observation and intensive critique and analysis of a city/film combination.

For the remainder of our time we will explore aspects of urbanism as explored and found in your own subject city. 

In the process and conversation - we can observe converging and diverging issues and effects upon the urban environs. As we look around we can begin to see connections in the history of cities that have been formed (or reformed) in similar ways. 

Boston grew up from earliest colonial traditions of town planning, the same central market, bay, and trade economy - the same economic, geographical and social factors that built cities like London - so it comes as no surprise that the cities are tangles of roads fanning out from the central initial settlement in ever growing rings, adjusted and impacted by thier waterways and associated industry. 

(See images of London and Boston)


And an additional map showing a more modern Boston with an overlay showing the original geography demonstrating the extent of full and land reclaimed from the bay. 


Similarly, when looking at cities such as London it is easy to see how William Penn inspired by history turned to the efficacy of the Roman grid, and adapted it into his initial plan for Philadephia. 

Further still, when Baron Hausman was contracted to give the medieval tangle of Parisian streets more freedom of movement he looked to the grand streets of Rome that the Popes had cut through the imperial and Medieval Roman sprawl to connect important social spaces. Hausman's plans for Paris took the drastic step of cutting brand new streets in a diamond pattern across the town linking up the various landmark spaces and places. In the evolution of France these great Alleès line with lights and trees in turn inspired other cuts through cities - Such as Philadelphia's Benjamin Franklin Parkway, or more symbolically, the ideals of revolutionary France - libertè, egalitè, fraternitè (Liberty, equality, brotherhood) were embodied in thier grand public streets - a style directly embodied and consciously adopted in the planning of Washington, DC. 

Views of Paris before and after the urban reworkings
Photo courtesy of  http://www.theparisblog.com/before-and-after-haussmann/

(See plans of Rome, Paris, Philadelphia, and Washington DC)

Map showing Pope Sixtua the Fifth's newly cut boulevards through Rome created to ease traffic and more easily move pilgrims between the holy sites of the city. Image courtesy of https://www.studyblue.com/notes/note/n/larch-la544-study-guide-2011-12-mcgirr/deck/9733220


Map of Paris showing the Haissmann overlay on the medieval city plan, image courtesy of http://www2.gwu.edu/~art/Temporary_SL/177/ah177_htmls/177_9lect_1.htm





This week your job is to share a map of your city and analyze explain and put forward why you think that district, era, industry, or other force acting upon the city has resulted in the form it developed. 

Focus your critique on a specific area or time, discussing the entire form of Philadelphia could take an entire semester! 

However it is manageable to discuss, for example, the genesis of the Benjamin Franklin Parkway, both in terms of its linkage to urban movements in cities elsewhere, and local design ideas. Consoder the grid of Philadelphia, and the desire for linkage between the central newly built grand City Hall and the great expanse of the continued forming Fairmount Park was identified by the Philadelphia urban elite as ripe for connection, and development. Industrialists of the city, newly enriched by their factories, railroads, and industry of the Philadelphia 'workshop of the world' saught to expand and display thier social sophistication by displaying thier cultural institutions along a grand promenade. A new axis was cut from the City Hall to the Fairmount Waterworks. Atop the previous reservoir on Fair amount a small hill adjacent to the water works, an elaborate edific was design to house art collections gathered by wealthy Philadelphia patrons. In effect the museum- looking even more large and impressive due to its high site, became the grand entrance to the park as citizens where'd past to enjoy the river banks on the weekends. Additionally, other venerable Philadelphia institutions were relocated, founded, or found new homes along the parkway's length - such as The Philadlephia Free Library, Franklin Institute, Rodin Museum, Academy of Science, international House, Cherry Street Friends School, a Philadelphia Courthouse, and the Cathedral of Sts Peter and Paul.

The famous watercolor painting by architect and landscape architect Paul Crete clearly shows the desired connection between City Hall, the Art-Museum-as-gatehouse and Fairmount Park....setting the stage several decades in advance for the famous Rocky run up the stairs and the papal stage....


This the creation, shape and effects of the Parkway in Philadelphia is founded in the park movement of the 1920s known as The City Beautiful Movement, Baron Hausman's Plan of Paris, and Papal Rome's boulevards...a fitting linkage which made the Parkway a prime location for the Papal visit to Philadelphia this past year!


1) What urban forces have acted to shape a district, area or neighborhood of the city you have studied?
Additional questions:
2) What maps, resources, media or imagery can you utilize to support this point?
3) What other cities share a common form with the aspects you are discussing?
3) Was this form visible in the film of your city? How do? Or why not? How do you think it effected or would have effected the film?

Posts due by next Wednesday April 27th

Final papers were due per the syllabus this week. However you will continue to utilize you paper and these assignments (including the previous homework assignment) to continue our study of urban form and effects. These assignments will be appended onto your paper as addendums. This gives a chance for students to more incisively study, critique illustrate and potentially improve thier work incrementally. Papers will be recollected for the class final handed in as digital PDFs only. 





Sunday, October 16, 2016

HFC F2016: Lecture 6

HFC S2016: Lecture 6 Spatial Critique

Please respond to the following questions for this week's lecture under the blog comments:

1) Pick a space within the city and describe how it functions in terms of the types of space listed in the lecture. Describe the space and its functions in detail, be specific. Most spaces are made up a collection of the elements of the types of space - identify the primary 'type' of space that the city space you choose is, identify the characteristics that signify that it is this spatial 'type' and explain how they function.

2) Most spaces within the city interact with adjacent spaces and spatial types within the city, explain how the space you chose interacts with, affects, and is affected by an adjoining urban space.

3a) Describe a space in Philadelphia Describe using the vocabulary of the lecture describe a space and the qualities of spatial relationships which the event utilized. Be specific.

3b) Describe a space not in Philadelphia: Describe a large outdoor civic event you were present for, using the vocabulary of the lecture describe the space and qualities of spatial relationships utilized by the event. Be specific.

Comments for this week's posts are due by Friday.

If you are encountering any issues posting comments please notify Prof Hart immediately. Forward a copy of your comments if you have any posting issues. I am working with tech staff to resolve these issues. 

HINT: To protect, refine and improve your written work it is recommended that you draft, proofread and edit your responses in a save word document before copy-and-pasting the text into the comments bar of the webpage - composing your comments only in the comments bar makes clear writing, editing and saving not just difficult but if you hit the wrong button impossible!!

Thursday, October 6, 2016

HFC F2016: Lecture 5 Labor, Work, Action | Commodity, Firmness, Delight

One quadrant of the idealized Vitruvian City - note the similarity with the prior Lecture's image of the Vitruvian Man. This similarity is not by chance  - philosopher Vitruvius wanted his ideas to scale across the human scale, the scale of the city, and that of the universe.

Vitruvius,  Architecture + City 

As we begin to explore the concepts that formulated the early cities, there are some very clear distinctions that have to be made. Today, the way we interpret urban form is radically different than the manner in which urban form in the city in history was both formulated and interpreted. Today's city is a collage or mixture of multi-uses, and layers of previous uses. Housing, industry, commercial and recreation are closely intertwined, woven into one another as the city has evolved over time. Some neighborhoods have stayed the same, or completely changed in their tenor, or even gone full circle during their local history. There is very little distinction made between buildings and spaces that are special to our society and buildings and spaces that exist only for the purpose of function. There is little distinction between the sacred and the profane or the special buildings versus the ordinary buildings. However, in the earliest cities this distinction was very clear and defined. The cities for example in ancient Greece were almost always delineated by an imaginary line which segregated the sacred part of the city from the profane segment. The distinction between the sacred and the profane was a powerful organizing device in conceptualizing the form of the city.
In order to understand the distinctions between the sacred and the profane and why these distinctions were so important in the earliest cities, we must first understand how and why such distinctions were made.
Various idealized city plan-forms that take design cues from Vitruvian ideals.

The theorist, Hannah Arendt, designated three activities that were critical in human activity. These three activities are: 
  • Labor 
  • Work 
  • Action 
Arendt assigned particular meanings to each of these terms; the two terms which have the most correlation to the form of cities are defined as:
  • Labor is the activity which corresponds to the biological process of the human body whose spontaneous growth, metabolism and eventual decay are bound to the vital necessities produced and fed into the life process by labor. 
  • Work is the activity which corresponds to the unnaturalness of human existence which is not imbedded in, and whose mortality is not compensated by the species ever recurring life cycle. 
  • Action  - a more nuanced approach that modifies the prior two.
In the context of these definitions and their relationship to urban form, labor is viewed as a constantly changing process, a necessity for survival and produces, in the context of architecture, buildings that are impermanent and synonymous with the private realm. Work, on the other hand, is an activity which produces elements that are permanent and are viewed as synonymous with the public realm. Early man viewed human energy in the context of labor and work. In the action of labor, man built structures which were essential for his survival and for the survival of the collective whole. These structures were impermanent and were not meant to be buildings that would become the artifacts of history for later generations to interpret. The erection of cells or the units of housing emerged through the activity of labor, the process of biological survival; housing dominates much of the urban fabric today and in the city of the past. Work for early man was a much more thoughtful process, and a process that relied on developing a collective mythology that would spiritually unite a society; in the context of architecture this collective mythology would evolve in the creation of buildings that embodied the spirit of this belief. These buildings become the "work of architecture", or the sacred buildings of a society.
In examining the many definitions of architecture through history, a common definition derived from antiquity through Vitriuvius is that architecture or "fine buildings" should have three things:
  • Commodity (function) 
  • Firmness (structural soundness) 
  • Delight (visual appeal) 
The dictionary offers two significantly different definitions for the word. The Greek word "architecton" meaning constructor, is defined firstly as the art or science of constructing edifices for human use and secondly as the action and process of building. In the context of Arendt's terms, the first definition is quote the "work" of architecture; the second definition is the "labor" of architecture. The term, "edifice" is a term which describes buildings that are stately and signify collective culturally views of a society. The building of an edifice is not essential for a society to survive physically. An edifice is a piece of art in the built fabric. The second definition of architecture is as stated above the "labor" of architecture or the building process that is essential for a society to survive. In the context of architecture, this process does not result in edifices but in the shelters that protect us from the natural elements. The Vitriuvian definition of architecture, that "fine buildings" should have commodity, firmness and delight is a definition which describes the "work" or "art" of architecture.

Ideals might not always be put into practice perfectly, but nonetheless they influence the form, shape, and personality the city grows into. Above, and image of an idealized plan for a Roman City (left) and the realized actual city (right)

The earliest cities frequently made a sharp distinction in location within the city between the "work", the edifices of collective mythology and the "labor", the shelters necessary for survival. Later in the semester, we will explore Greek cities in antiquity in which the delineation between the sacred buildings (the work of architecture)and the profane buildings (the labor of architecture) is absolutely clear.

Many cities are easily discernible by their unique street plans. This style of map - called a Nolli Map - shows available and useable public space (streets sidewalks, open areas, parks) as void white spaces and private space as shaded black.

Visualize a city that is very familiar to you. How would this city appear if this principle were applied - answer using the following questions. 

Please respond to the following questions for this week's lecture under the blog comments:
  1. DUE MONDAY: Pick a space within the city (Philadelphia or another city that you name) and describe how it functions in terms of the types of space listed in the lecture. Describe the space and its functions in detail, be specific. Most spaces are made up a collection of the elements of the types of space - identify the primary 'type' of space that the city space you choose is, identify the characteristics that signify that it is this spatial 'type' and explain how they function.
  2. DUE MONDAY: Most spaces within the city interact with adjacent spaces and spatial types within the city, explain how the space you chose interacts with, affects, and is affected by an adjoining urban space.
  3. DUE WEDNESDAY: Select one of the city spaces described by one of your classmates and write a brief critique of the space, their application of the types of space. Be critical in augmenting or reinforcing, or deconstructing their argument.

Questions 1 + 2 are due by by Monday

Question 3 is due by Wednesday